The Heroes Round Table

ditto

Broken Wand: We don't like probabilistic items, do we Dalai? ;) Honestly, there are too many %'s I think... Items with negative effects are interesting. It's annoying if you get one, but that's the point :devious:. However, there must be a way to get rid of them. They should be transferable, for ins...

Valuable comments, thanks! I too think that Mass Flight would be cool to have, Dalai didn't like it :hoo: Well, adding it should have a real value so that Order Guild is not weakened by useless but cool spells :) I liked the Mass Life Ward idea, why didn't I think about it first :-D Apparently, Torc...

Well, I'm using a 1900x1200 on a 15.4" laptop, and the pics are just so tiny for me that there's no way I can find the flaws given their detail

@GOW Thanks for your comments. Torched Attack is to be cast on the enemy, so that their attack becomes a fire-based attack. So, for example the efreet will receive half the damage from these foes, so will a Fireguard, and so will a Fire Shield'ed friend. So, it's kind of a tactical defensive spell. ...

I got the 5 too, sent a PM but maybe a little late...

I have four.
Five if we count that the picture to the right is fuzzier

You're probably right about Fire Shield is that it is too non-chaotic. I was thinking about it along with using the Armageddon spell, or the Torched Attack. But it probably doesn't fit the faction. Torched Attack by itself is also a defensive spell. It would be useful to protect the Fireguard or the...

hmm...

Weird. I don't see any difference in Firefox nor in IE. Strangely enough, in Firefox the pictures in the US site are not aligned, but it looks like so with IE

Wow, how could you come up with it? I had no chance...

Btw, I was a "Super Peasant" at 99

Yes, I think TT should be safe. And, Vlad976, you may not be any safe at all

Kalah, are you there?

Veldrynus wrote:Hu?

Well, I can see the difference in the pictures, but the font sizes in the websites are just the same to me...

Could that be related to the glass of red you had Kalah?

Wildbear wrote:

gryphonheart wrote:Taj Mahal was built in 1653.

Yeah, it took them 2 months to build it

Well, yeah it sounds funny. I meant its construction was finished in 1653
As a side note, construction of Taj Mahal lasted 22 years!!!

But, then what's this white great wonder that disappeared in 1653?