Welcome Visitor [sign up] news downloads walkthroughs forums about  
Welcome to Celestial Heavens! - all things Might and Magic
sections
 
my account
Username
Password
  Forgot password?
  Home
  Submit Map
  Contact Us
 
my account
  Academy Guide 3.1
  Artifacts
  Creature Abilities
  First Month Utopia
  Hero Screen
  Inferno TotE Guide
  New Sylvan Strategy
  Screenshots
  Skill Wheel
  Spells
  Story
  Unofficial Guide
 
my account
  Hammers of Fate
  Tribes of the East
 
my account
  Academy
  Dungeon
  Fortress
  Haven
  Inferno
  Necropolis
  Sylvan
 
my account
  Maps
  Mods
  Patches
 
my account
  Forums
  Equilibris Mod
  LotA
  Thunder Maps
  Wake of Gods Mod
  More Links
 
my account
  Interviews
  Map Reviews
  Special Features
 
my account
H7: Would you prefer 2D or 3D townscreens?
2D
3D
I don't care.
game selector


Heroes of Might and Magic V  → Fortress Creatures Statistics

by Staff

Untitled Document
CREATURE STATISTICS
NECROPOLIS
INFERNO
FORTRESS CREATURE STATISTICS

This page uses Javascript - you need it enabled to see the page.
Comments

Metal Wolf at 2007-09-05 15:30 wrote:
The Battlerager... still no match for other 4th tier creatures, even the unapgraded ones. Yet, I like him! always liked the design of these brawlers/berserkers, and in seems that the battlerager can at least take a hit or two, unlike the former... And his abilites - sound promising.
Bash- guess its like Shield bash
Anti giant - Against 7 tier creaturs? maybe a tiny bonus against every creature which stands on 4 squares?
Battle rage - Due to the cost of the battlerager, I dont think its better than Berserker rage.. Cause if it is - then there is absolutely no dillema about making the choice between him and the Berserker

Wraith at 2007-07-19 12:15 wrote:
because lv7 creatures cost reduced,i think fire dragons cost will be reduced in expansion.
Edited on Thu, Jul 19 2007, 08:15 by Wraith

ZireX at 2007-07-19 12:12 wrote:
Compare it to the Fire Dragon-not the Magma one.The price is cheaper(100gld and 1c) and still the LAva Dragon is better...how come?

Wraith at 2007-07-19 11:59 wrote:
WTF? IS MAGMA DRAGONS DEFENCE NOW 45?!!!!! IT ATTACK IS INCEREASED TOO
Edited on Thu, Jul 19 2007, 08:01 by Wraith

Cleanpea at 2007-07-19 10:53 wrote:
The lava dragon's defence and attack is significantly lower than Magma dragon's. And that means alot in combat.

Infiltrator at 2007-07-19 10:41 wrote:
All level 7 unit prices will be reduced.

Wraith at 2007-07-19 10:40 wrote:
it is for sale

ZireX at 2007-07-19 09:05 wrote:
Can someone tell me why the Lava Dragon is cheaper then the Fire Dragon when it's obviously better?

Moragauth at 2007-06-07 19:15 wrote:
Berserkers look ridiculous. Way too big for dwarves. Nival should resize them.

Cleanpea at 2007-01-03 09:59 wrote:
skirmisher/shieldguard with Karli in the beginning of a game is a rocking combination. Because he has soldiers luck and speciality: skirmisher.

winterfate at 2007-01-03 02:33 wrote:
Those darned Shieldguards are rather effective. I like them! :D

kingcranium14 at 2007-01-02 23:53 wrote:
I've gotta go with thanes and stormlords.

Cleanpea at 2007-01-02 22:58 wrote:
i like skirmishers the best

Metal Militant at 2007-01-02 19:04 wrote:
What do you think about the other creatures? My favourite is blackbear rider, i think it's pretty cool.

DaemianLucifer at 2006-12-12 21:05 wrote:
Yes IYO but not in mine :P The look is what I expected in a good way, but yes the magma shield special is just too similar to the fire drakes fire shield. :| :|

I was talking about the phoenix.

Orfinn at 2006-12-12 21:01 wrote:
Yes IYO but not in mine :P The look is what I expected in a good way, but yes the magma shield special is just too similar to the fire drakes fire shield.

DaemianLucifer at 2006-12-12 00:58 wrote:
Yes,but its name is only a small problem.Its looks is another much bigger one,and its "specials" another just as big.

Orfinn at 2006-12-11 23:51 wrote:
A mod takes care of the dragon problemhttp://www.celestialheavens.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4949&start=0 , renaming them to drakes, but indeed, setting units ablaze is a bad excuse to show off shiney things :P

ThunderTitan at 2006-12-08 14:28 wrote:
It walks like it's been droped on the head as a child, and they sit up too straight. Plus they're basicaly non-flying Phoenixes without rebirth.

DaemianLucifer at 2006-12-08 12:07 wrote:
Too shiney and too godzila like.Plus its named dragon.

Orfinn at 2006-12-08 10:33 wrote:
"So nothing.Some people have weird taste.Some even like the gargoyle and the djinn.Their prob...I mean their thing :devil:"

Im just too adoptable to like things as they are if nothing can be done about it, of course things could always be better....or worse. Someone of you magma dragon dislikers, tell me why the MD looks bad, too hot for you? describe it in detail please :butterfly::P
Edited on Fri, Dec 08 2006, 03:34 by Orfinn

DaemianLucifer at 2006-11-30 15:37 wrote:
- || -

ThunderTitan at 2006-11-30 15:28 wrote:
i like the magma dragon. i also like the gargoyle and the djinn. does that make me a bad person?

No, just one with awful tastes.

soupnazii at 2006-11-29 21:07 wrote:
CORRECTION: Stormlord is written as "Warlord".


edit: i just thought: somebody needs to get working on a strategy for this town, we already have 1 for all other towns.
Edited on Wed, Nov 29 2006, 14:09 by soupnazii

soupnazii at 2006-11-29 21:06 wrote:
"So nothing.Some people have weird taste.Some even like the gargoyle and the djinn.Their prob...I mean their thing :devil:"

i like the magma dragon. i also like the gargoyle and the djinn. does that make me a bad person? :)

Sandro123 at 2006-11-29 19:23 wrote:
Overall look on the whole dwarf lineup:

For all of defensive players out there, you finally got you race! But in terms of attack, the dwarves suck. Some of the creatures are really useful, others not so much. But a really good thing about the dwarves is that with runic magic in play, it gets so much more interesting! And the 'expansion' dwarves bring numerous different strategies with them!

I personally adore this new race and I believe many others do! This town lineup is a really balanced one and it would require a lot of thinking to win with these guys!

but, hey thinking is the name of this game!

Sandro123 at 2006-11-29 19:11 wrote:
Now some quick comment on all the units:

defender - good, but not good enough for a cool lvl 1. Lacks damage range. upgrade asap!

shieldguard - cool specials, defence and hit points. worth a lot in early game if your city is being assaulted and you a have a guard post. ONe of the best lvl1 upgs.

spearwielder - you might he is punier than gremlins, and he is. unless he does his crippling wound every time he strikes, he is worthless. seems like orcs from h4.

skirmisher - a couple of hit points is cool, but the double in damage range is just super!

bear rider - well, he can sirvive a lot of beating in the early stages, but weak overall. no specials is no bonus:(

blackbear rider - paw strike rules! almost every time you do not get retaliated! armoured seems a bit useless, but his unweavering defence might be useful against vulnerability or the rider charge of lizard riders.

brawler - totally worthless! he has a growth booster dwelling and that's all! upgrade asap!

berserker - as I said before, it strickes with no retaliation(seriously ias there any time when you will NOT use this ability?) and could be deadly in great numbers and backed up with a couple of runes. althought it is sooo fragile, his offence properties compensate for that! Finally, an offensive dwarf!

Rune preist - good all around unit, but not very useful in end game... upg unit is a whole lot better. magic proof is his coolest ability. I do not think anybody will waste a shooting turn to cast deflect missle. mark of fire is useless, unless evrry time you cast a spell, it is fireball.

Rune patriarch - crossfire is really cool, though it is more fitting for the Haven Priest(i picture them more like cristians) . Firewall and mark of fire do come together well.

Thane - he has a really cool ability, something like the minotaur's double strike, done in one turn! But a just one level six flier isn't very good them dwarves...

WarLord - Storm bolt probably isn't worth the upgrade, but plus a 20% hp boost plus a minor damge increase add up to form something a lot more powerful than the Thane. Still not worth 400 extra bucks.

Fire dragon - great hp, medium damage range above-average attack and defence values. Fire breath and fire shield make it look like a half phoenix.Great lvl 7! And just wait till you see the upgrade. Although it doesn't qualify as a dragon, since it as slow as a steel golem anfd doesn't have wings(I have always hated the h3 crystal dragon for that reason)!

Magma dragon - 50 hp boost, +10 attack and defence points, and... that's it! It offers nothing more(do not think that magma shield is something different than fire shield). Is it really worth the extra 1000 gold and 1 crystal? I sincerely doubt it!123
Edited on Thu, Dec 07 2006, 11:46 by Sandro123

Sandro123 at 2006-11-29 14:44 wrote:
the best asset of the dwarves is not their monsters, but rather their runic magic. Although the berserker or blackbear rider's specials are awesome, the creatures simply lack attack and, in some cases, hit points points(except maybe magma dragon, one of the coolest lvl 7s in the game!). And besides, their shooters have only 9 shots in total!

What i mean is that, for example, the berserker is something like a half-blood fury, but it lacks it's attacki pts and super speed to become a full one. To make it strong, you would need a rune of dragonform and another one-rune of charge.

DaemianLucifer at 2006-11-22 15:42 wrote:
And here it is used just so that the dragons would be different :disagree:

Gaidal Cain at 2006-11-22 15:24 wrote:
Btw,whats thedeal with having fire breath and acid breath when they both do the same?

One would hope that one is affected by abilities and skills that affect reistance to fire, and the other doesn't. It would have made some sense in H4 at leasdt, with phoenixes and efreeti not being affected if they were the second target of BD breath attack.

Cleanpea at 2006-11-22 10:49 wrote:
:)

DaemianLucifer at 2006-11-22 10:34 wrote:
So nothing.Some people have weird taste.Some even like the gargoyle and the djinn.Their prob...I mean their thing :devil:

Cleanpea at 2006-11-22 10:27 wrote:
I also think the magma dragon looks good-and so what?

DaemianLucifer at 2006-11-22 09:41 wrote:
And the magma dragon looks terrifying...in a good way ^^

You are one of the very few that think that.

Btw,whats the deal with having fire breath and acid breath when they both do the same?

Orfinn at 2006-11-22 08:40 wrote:
One of the coolest town lineups, nice specials on all units. But the drawback are to many dwarves. And the magma dragon looks terrifying...in a good way ^^

Capt_Tripps at 2006-11-22 00:45 wrote:
I hate to say it, but the shieldguard picture reminds me of the movie Little Nicky.

Marzhin at 2006-11-21 11:17 wrote:
No they aren't. The upgraded one in the one with a black rocky armor.

Skullmane at 2006-11-21 11:08 wrote:
Aren't the Magma and Fire dragon pics other way around?

soupnazii at 2006-11-21 02:34 wrote:
a new slot needs to be added to the circle thing at the top to fit the fortress.

DaemianLucifer at 2006-11-21 02:18 wrote:
I think you misspelled.It should be fotress :devious:

Note: You must be logged in to post comments.

Copyright 1999-2015 Celestial Heavens. All rights reserved.
site statistics