The Heroes Round Table

[mr. burns]Excellent[/mr. burns]

It will be difficult to come up with a full set of games without recycling old contests. And I think Robenhagen will appreciate his break now -- he spent a lot of time on this. I can imagine it must have taken hours & hours to come up with some of those contests, especially the "30 Questio...

My lips are sealed

Robenhagen wrote:The thread has been unlocked for you to post your congratulations to the winners and any comments you might have.

For real this time

The thread has been unlocked for you to post your congratulations to the winners and any comments you might have.

We'll obviously only consider one submission from each contestant, but if you have more than one which you want to publish, we can't stop you. Well, let's say someone submits two for your consideration and both of them are really good; how will one be chosen? Will it be the judges' decision which o...

RobB wrote:... although the passage is a bit tricky...

Keep in mind that even if you think the passage is tricky, the computer 'sees' things in another way; if there's a free passage the AI can see it clearly, even if a player can't see it because of map objects blocking the view.

gravyluvr wrote:Maybe GW is writing under a pseudonym?

GhostWriter is a pseudonym But I find it highly unlikely that Casey is using a different account and posting in secret.

Oakwarrior wrote:So THAT'S what I get for changing Angelspit to Robenhagen in the last question :p

Yeah - tough call

ThunderTitan wrote:And where did AS say he's gonna be a father?!

Nowhere

HodgePodge wrote:Oooo, is this an open invation to spam?!? Just kidding.

No kidding - I think spamming is encouraged. As far as I understand the posts are lost after the test is complete - the important thing is to see how the server behaves under stress, so just spam ahead.

There is no pre-defined 'objective_check', but you can script it yourself, I believe that is what he meant.

Nope, it hasn't arrived.

Where did you send it?

Quit posting in the locked topics

You can call it overtime or whatever, but in reality we're just waiting for Oak to get his stuff together

I can't remember if this has already been discussed, but recently I've found myself really missing the possibility to use a 'Decrease Current Movement' script in the editor. Would it be possible to add such a script option?

What relpy are you waiting for? (Got your submission if that's it).

I'm still at work, so you have time to send in your answers (I'll hold off the results until we get your answers).

Anyone, besides Oak, who're caught off-guard, please post here if we can expect an answer from you - thanks.