Spiderman 3

The Mad Dragon · Unread postby **The Mad Dragon** » 14 Nov 2006, 06:58

Yes, that should be interesting. Isn't it going to concentrate on his past?

DaemianLucifer · Unread postby **DaemianLucifer** » 14 Nov 2006, 06:58

And this is all connected to spiderman 3 how exactly?

The Mad Dragon · Unread postby **The Mad Dragon** » 14 Nov 2006, 07:02

Marvel

asandir · Unread postby **asandir** » 14 Nov 2006, 07:14

well I could create another thread for this talk if you prefer??

I thought Hulk was actually immune to mind control when enraged, but can't find supporting info for it, maybe I made it up .... nevermind

The Mad Dragon · Unread postby **The Mad Dragon** » 14 Nov 2006, 07:17

Hulk Abilities: Superhuman strength, stamina, and invulnerability. Regenerative healing factor. Ability to see and communicate with astral bodies. Gamma radiation absorption. Transformation. Strong resistance (but not immunity) to mind control.

DaemianLucifer · Unread postby **DaemianLucifer** » 14 Nov 2006, 07:17

stefan.urlus wrote:well I could create another thread for this talk if you prefer??

Its not what I prefer,its what mods prefer.So if you dont whant this one closed,create a separate thread.

Mytical · Unread postby **Mytical** » 14 Nov 2006, 07:17

To get this back on track. Spiderman 3..to me spider 2 wasn't as good as Spider 1, and chances are Spider 3 will be even worse (it is the way things usually go). There are exceptions of course, but its the 'rule' of movies. Something makes fans go 'wow' the first time, 'alright!' the second time, and 'eh..whatever' the third time.

DaemianLucifer · Unread postby **DaemianLucifer** » 14 Nov 2006, 07:20

Not just the movies.Its the rule in everything.Mostly due to originality and nostalgian,the originals are almost always the best.There are exceptions though,like HII for example

asandir · Unread postby **asandir** » 14 Nov 2006, 07:22

Apparently Pirates of the Carribean didn't suffer this ....

But I do think that is the case with spidey, it certainly was with me, but then I have never been the biggest fan of spidey as a superhero

The Mad Dragon · Unread postby **The Mad Dragon** » 14 Nov 2006, 07:23

Why does DL find ways to go off topic? lol

Anyways, I thought Spider 1 and Spider 2 were really well done. I really connected with each character and they were brought forth rather well.

DaemianLucifer · Unread postby **DaemianLucifer** » 14 Nov 2006, 07:24

stefan.urlus wrote:Apparently Pirates of the Carribean didn't suffer this ....

I dunno.Will tell you in a few days when I watch the sequel.

asandir · Unread postby **asandir** » 15 Nov 2006, 00:09

and I don't know either, that's why I put an apparently in there ....

now back on-topic, I know someone above was going on about Doc Ock and how well he was done, but he just so didn't do it for me .... I was very passe about his character, maybe it is just me, but he seemed very blegh

ThunderTitan · Unread postby **ThunderTitan** » 15 Nov 2006, 08:18

I prefer my Doc Ock as an amoral scientist that's after revenge or money for experiments.

Bethel · Unread postby **Bethel** » 15 Nov 2006, 18:31

ThunderTitan wrote:I prefer my Doc Ock as an amoral scientist that's after revenge or money for experiments.

I always found that version of Doc Ock to be boring to the max. In Spdey 2 he was written in such a way that I could find sympathy for the character, which I hadn't previously believed possible.

Different roads, different milage. Maybe it's a guy/girl thing...

ThunderTitan · Unread postby **ThunderTitan** » 15 Nov 2006, 19:01

Bethel wrote: I always found that version of Doc Ock to be boring to the max. In Spdey 2 he was written in such a way that I could find sympathy for the character, which I hadn't previously believed possible.

Different roads, different milage. Maybe it's a guy/girl thing...

Pls, they've been doing the sympathetic villain thing for too long. And Spidey has plenty of other villains that are that way. Why can't someone just not care? And that whole "nanites drove me crazy" thing sucked.

Omega_Destroyer · Unread postby **Omega_Destroyer** » 15 Nov 2006, 19:28

Green Goblin didn't really care too much. Plus he couldn't blame his craziness on the nanites. He would have to blame it on the serum or whatever it was.

ThunderTitan · Unread postby **ThunderTitan** » 15 Nov 2006, 19:46

Yeah, GG was the original "gone crazy because of whatever gave him superpowers" guy, and Norman did care, when he wasn't wacko. Doc Ock was the "i had enough of money getting in the way of science" guy.

I'm really hoping Brock is an as*hole with a thing against Parker/Spidey.

Corribus · Unread postby **Corribus** » 15 Nov 2006, 19:57

ThunderTitan wrote: Pls, they've been doing the sympathetic villain thing for too long. And Spidey has plenty of other villains that are that way. Why can't someone just not care? And that whole "nanites drove me crazy" thing sucked.

That's actually true. Every villain these days has a secret heart of gold. What ever happened to the guys that ran over little bunny rabbits just to hear them go *SQUISH*?

Omega_Destroyer · Unread postby **Omega_Destroyer** » 15 Nov 2006, 20:15

We put them in Slasher films or really bad action movies like Ultraviolet.

ThunderTitan · Unread postby **ThunderTitan** » 15 Nov 2006, 20:39

Corribus wrote: That's actually true.

Everythjing i say it's true [size=0]except what isn't[/size]. Scientific FACT.

Doc Ock is supposed to just care more about science then lives without being insane by nanites.

The Heroes Round Table

Spiderman 3

Who is online