|
| |
|
|
||
|
|
|
| Check out the T-shirt worn by Romain de Waubert in the video diary. That's not a "V" on there, is it? Thanks to Marzhin.
[ Previous ] [ Next ] |
| Comments | ||
 | ThunderTitan at 2009-08-05 06:06 wrote: | |
|---|---|---|
| Ha... literary analysis, the last refuge of a failing story related argument. No sh1t that the focus is different (though you're prob giving Ubival too much credit if you think it was intentional), that hardly means it's not the same story (what, you never seen anyone use the old "same story, but from another perspective" trick to sell yet another book without having to write a new story?) | ||
 | Bandobras Took at 2009-07-31 09:31 wrote: | |
| The main entities of the Heroes III story are kingdoms. The goal is dominion through conquest. Even with the SoD prequel, Sandro works through manipulating a king and a kingdom. From start to finish, the question is simply one of power. The main entities of the Heroes V story are characters. The goals are redemption (on the part of Raelag/Zehir) or corruption (on the part of the Demon Sovereign/Biara). The conflicts are primarily over ideology, not over political boundaries. You have to go to details before you find a solid similarity between the two that is not to be found in any two fantasy stories involving a war. | ||
| ThunderTitan at 2009-07-31 02:19 wrote: | |
| Just like Batman isn't copied of Zorro coz he has pointy ears instead of a hat... | ||
 | darknessfood at 2009-07-29 19:29 wrote: | |
| Both of you, go fight somewhere else, just keep it ontopic!!! | ||
| Bandobras Took at 2009-07-29 13:34 wrote: | |
| Ah, if we're simply speaking of general ideas being right, then you still royally screwed up. Generally speaking, the H5 plot and the H3 plot were nothing like each other. | ||
| ThunderTitan at 2009-07-29 02:42 wrote: | |
| @Bandobras Took You obviously misunderstood... the always proven right is about the general idea being right, not every little detail of it being exactly like i said... because if i could do that i'd be a smurfing fortune teller. | ||
 | Shad0WeN at 2009-07-28 20:20 wrote: | |
| here's a better shot of the shirt:
http://heroescommunity.com/filespace/AOH/news/HoMM6_proof.jpg | ||
| Bandobras Took at 2009-07-28 18:29 wrote: | |
| At this point, I'd settle for you remembering what you post from page to page. Whatever your private definition of "always" is, the standard defintion means "every single time." Feel free to amend your statement to "usually proven right" and I'll have no problem. :) | ||
 | CloudRiderX at 2009-07-28 15:31 wrote: | |
| If you go on to Youtube and search for Might and Magic: Clash of Heroes, and then view Developer Diary#3, there is a segment of video that shows the two sides of his shirt in sequence. Because he is always covering one side with his leg, its difficult to make out what the shirt says, but at 0:54 and 0:56, his legs switch, and you can pause the video and flicker back and forth.
It clearly reads: "Might and Magic: Heroes VI". | ||
| ThunderTitan at 2009-07-28 11:12 wrote: | |
| Oh really, and me here thinking i had to see the future exactly as it will happen, down to the littlest detail that a human wouldn't even be able to remember if he was focusing on something else. | ||
| Bandobras Took at 2009-07-28 09:55 wrote: | |
| Why yes. I believe being proven right means you actually have to be correct. :) | ||
| ThunderTitan at 2009-07-28 06:44 wrote: | |
| How was i not proven right?! Let me guess, it wasn't 100% on the mark... as if. Unless you're referring to the Sandro bit... which would be funny as it implied you think i was deluded enough that they'd be nice enough to actually link Ashan with the old M&M worlds beyond some name dropping. | ||
| Bandobras Took at 2009-07-27 17:37 wrote: | |
| Claiming to always be proven right is at the very least self-deception. ;) | ||
| ThunderTitan at 2009-07-26 16:44 wrote: | |
| At least mine can be linked to... | ||
| Bandobras Took at 2009-07-26 11:37 wrote: | |
| Your hallucinations don't count... Obviously. But then, neither do yours. :) | ||
| ThunderTitan at 2009-07-25 15:16 wrote: | |
| Your hallucinations don't count... | ||
| Bandobras Took at 2009-07-25 11:49 wrote: | |
| And yet i'm always proven right... Especially if one ignores all the times you've been proven wrong. ;) | ||
| ThunderTitan at 2009-07-25 04:14 wrote: | |
| And yet i'm always proven right... | ||
 | Corlagon at 2009-07-24 16:56 wrote: | |
| Yep, that was the one. They're not the same image I guess, but a bit similar. | ||
 | Vlaad II at 2009-07-24 15:39 wrote: | |
| You mean this pic? Or something else? Because the creature on the shirt looks more like a demon... | ||
 | ywhtptgtfo at 2009-07-24 14:00 wrote: | |
| Possibly a T-Shift of HoMM 6 logo | ||
| Corlagon at 2009-07-24 09:50 wrote: | |
| Great find. The image on the t-shirt somewhat resembles a piece of Behemoth concept art I saw at HC months ago... | ||
 | Thelonious at 2009-07-24 09:10 wrote: | |
| @ Marzhin: That you still find TT amazing... ;| Great finding this tidbit though. Don't think they meant to show that... :devious: | ||
 | Marzhin at 2009-07-24 04:28 wrote: | |
| @ TT : you manage to find something to whine about in a single, blurry artwork, on a wrinkled t-shirt ? Amazing. | ||
| ThunderTitan at 2009-07-24 02:44 wrote: | |
| Dammit, the demon on the shirt look too Disciples-y... my fear are coming true and the 2 series will become too indistinguishable... | ||
 | evilp at 2009-07-24 00:05 wrote: | |
| ....vi?God... | ||
Note: You must be logged in to post comments.